Skip to main content

Negative Emotions Can Make You Less Trusting

A new study finds that negative emotions can reduce the ability to trust others, even when these emotions were triggered by events that have nothing to do with the decision to trust.

The research, published in the journal Science Advances, was conducted by an international team from the University of Zurich (UZH) in Switzerland and the University of Amsterdam (UvA).

It is no secret that feelings toward a specific person can influence your interaction and trust levels — for example, if a friend says your new haircut is terrible and then asks to borrow your car, you will probably be less likely to say yes.

But what happens when your negative feelings are triggered by events that have nothing to do with the person? For instance, your boss yells at you today and then your friend calls and asks to borrow something of value.

In the field of psychology, these emotions are called “incidental,” because they were triggered by events that are unrelated to our currently ongoing social interactions. It has been shown that incidental emotions frequently occur in our day-to-day interactions with others, although we might not be fully aware of them.

For the study, UvA neuroeconomist Dr. Jan Engelmann teamed up with UZH neuroeconomists Drs. Ernst Fehr, Christian Ruff and Friederike Meyer. They investigated whether incidental negative emotions can influence trust behavior and the brain networks associated with social interactions.

To create a prolonged state of negative affect (emotions), the team used the well-established threat-of-shock method, in which participants are threatened with (but only sometimes given) an unpleasant electrical shock. This threat has been shown to reliably induce anticipatory anxiety.

Meanwhile, participants played a trust game, which involved decisions about how much money they wanted to invest in a stranger (with the stranger having the option to repay in kind, or keep all the invested money to themselves). Indeed, the participants trusted significantly less when they were anxious about being shocked, even though the threat was unrelated to their decision to trust.

During this time, the participants’ brain responses were recorded using functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI). These images revealed that a brain region widely implicated in understanding others’ beliefs — the temporoparietal junction (TPJ) — was significantly suppressed during trust decisions when participants felt threatened, but not when they felt safe.

The connectivity between the TPJ and the amygdala was also significantly suppressed by these negative emotions.

However, under safe conditions, the strength of the connectivity between the TPJ and other important social cognition regions, such as the posterior superior temporal sulcus and the dorsomedial prefrontal cortex, predicted how much participants trusted others. This association between brain activity and behavior was neutralized when participants felt anxious.

“These results show that negative emotions can significantly impact our social interactions, and specifically how much we trust others,” said authors Engelmann and Ruff.

“They also reveal the underlying effects of negative affect on brain circuitry: Negative affect suppresses the social cognitive neural machinery important for understanding and predicting others’ behavior.”

According to Engelmann, the findings reveal that negative emotions can have important consequences on how we approach social interactions.

“In light of recent political events in the U.K. and the forthcoming elections for the European Parliament, the results also contain a warning: Negative emotions, even if they are incidental, may distort how we make important social decisions, including voting.”

Source: University of Zurich

 



from Psych Central News https://ift.tt/2UHCskQ
via IFTTT

Become a patron of The Carlisle Wellness Network. Show everyone that you think this service is worth at least a buck. Go to; https://www.patreon.com/carlislewellness and pledge one dollar per month and help improve the resources it takes to gather the articles you see here as well as create fresh content including interviews an podcasts. We only need one dollar per month from all of our patrons to give The Carlisle Wellness Network a bright furture in the health and wellness social media ecosystem.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Working Remotely Is Not Necessarily Stress-Free

Many believe that working from home or remotely can foster freedom and stress-free job satisfaction, and that everyone wants  more work autonomy. A new study from Baylor University in Waco, Texas, says “Not so fast.” In the study, researchers examined the impact of remote work on employee well-being. Their findings suggest that a variety of factors can undermine or accent the employee benefits of working off-site. Accordingly, researchers developed new strategies to help managers provide remote-work opportunities that are valuable to the employee and the company. “Any organization, regardless of the extent to which people work remotely, needs to consider well-being of their employees as they implement more flexible working practices,” the researchers wrote. The study appears in the European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology . In the review, a total of 403 working adults were surveyed for the two studies that made up the research, said lead author Sara Perry, Ph.D. Re

Ecuador Backtracks on Criminal Justice Reforms, Increases Penalties for Drug Selling

QUITO, ECUADOR — In a disappointing move, Ecuador increased penalties for small-scale drug sellers yesterday, reversing reforms approved last year that differentiated between possession of small amounts of drugs and larger quantities with intent to sell, where there had previously been no differentiation. However, yesterday the National Assembly voted to modify the criminal code and […] Ecuador Backtracks on Criminal Justice Reforms, Increases Penalties for Drug Selling | The Daily Chronic from The Daily Chronic http://ift.tt/1QQK0sA via IFTTT

Discovery may change cancer treatment

A discovery has been made that may change the principles for treating certain types of cancer. The discovery relates to the so-called telomeres that constitute the ends of human chromosomes. Short telomeres are related to unhealthy lifestyles, old age and the male gender -- all of which are risk factors in terms of high mortality. Up until now, the assumption has been that short telomeres are related to ill health. The challenge for researchers worldwide has therefore been to find out whether or not the short telomeres were indeed a signifier or an indirect cause of increased mortality. from Top Health News -- ScienceDaily http://ift.tt/1InZmDb via IFTTT